In response to a letter to NJ Sen. Ron Rice who represents the Essex County District and chairs NJ's Legislative Black Caucus calling for introduction of a NJ Decarceration Act, Sen. Rice met with the Committee to Decarcerate the Garden State. He expressed his openness to the proposed bill and suggested to our committee that we provide an initial draft of such a bill. Below is the initial draft as provided to Sen. Rice late in the evening on July 22,
On line petition:
Print and circulate petition from this link:
http://decarceratenj.org/DecarcActPet.docx
NJ Decarceration Act Initial Draft
On line petition:
Print and circulate petition from this link:
http://decarceratenj.org/DecarcActPet.docx
NJ Decarceration Act Initial Draft
Whereas: United States has the world’s highest incarceration rate and incarcerates 25% of the worlds incarcerated while only making up 6% of the world’s population;
Whereas: There are growing calls in
NJ for decarceration measures across the political spectrum in the interest of
cost savings as well as human rights;
Whereas: There is an outcry from the
Newark community and in Essex County in the form of community meetings, forums,
petitions and letters calling for action to address the crisis of mass
incarceration;
Whereas: The rates of recidivism and
the violence and abuse many of those who are incarcerated are subject to, both
institutional as well as at the hands of other incarcerated inmates, demonstrates
the diminished success of the correctional system;
Whereas: NJ holds over 20,000
incarcerated persons in NJ state prisons;
Whereas: There are severe racial
disparities among those incarcerated in NJ with Black people representing
60% of the NJ incarcerated persons;
Whereas the disproportionate
incarceration of NJ’s Black population is directly linked to economic
disparities as well as racism in policing, prosecution and sentencing;
Whereas: Economic conditions
including joblessness and sub-livable wages increases the propensity toward
non-violent criminal acts of economic survival;
Whereas: Mass incarceration
undermines the family of targeted communities by removing adult members that
are needed for parenting and mentoring;
Whereas: A child who has an
incarcerated parent, has a 1/3 chance increased likelihood they will have
interaction with the criminal justice system;
Whereas: Mass incarceration
undermines the political power of targeted communities by making it impossible
for the incarcerated to vote and to participate in community organizations that
advocate for the betterment of the community and volunteer to help the youth,
elderly, those with disabilities or otherwise those needing support;
Whereas: The political weakening of
targeted communities makes it easier for corporations and powerful political
organizations to exploit the resources of those communities for personal gain
and against the best wishes of those communities;
Whereas: Mass incarceration
undermines the targeted community economically by removing the young adults
during their age of prime income generating potential;
Whereas: (percentage) of NJ state
inmates are incarcerated for small scale non-violent drug and drug related
offenses.
Whereas: The cost per person incarcerated
is over $50,0000 per year;
Whereas: It has been amply
demonstrated through studies that funds expended on creation of employment
opportunities, re-entry support and incarceration prevention has a far greater
effectiveness in preventing incarceratoin;
Therefore be it resolved: That we
enact the NJ Decarceration Act introducting robust goals for decarceraton and
defining timelines and criterion for large scale prison release. Goals
are as follows:
NJ’s incarcerated persons are to be
reduced by 20% over the next 2 years and by 50% over next 4 years.
Be it further resolved: That the
following criteria be utilized to free NJ’s state incarcerated persons:
* those incarcerated for non –
violent simple drug possession charges and related arrest charges;
- Those incarcerated for small-scale non-violent economic crimes of survival
- Those sentenced to under 6 months prison time
- Those sentenced to 1 year or less who have served 50% or more of their term
- Those sentenced to over 1 year to 3 years who have served 70% of their term
- Those sentenced to over 3 years to 5 years who have served 80% of their term
- Those over the age of 60 who have served 80% of their term
Be it further resolved: That 100% of
the savings from the cost of housing each decarcerated person freed be
redirected to providing meaningful training and employment in tasks of building
and rebuilding urban housing, infrastructure, clinics and other public projects
and to support services for those that need them for successful re-entry into
the community;
Be it further resolved that upon
release, legal restrictions and discrimination in hiring, housing, education
and other lingering penalties including financial burdens be removed to support
greater potential success for each individual's community re-entry;
Be it further resolved: That any and
all NJ restrictions on voting on those who are incarcerated or formerly
incarcerated be removed and that voting be extended to those who are serving in
NJ institutions and not restricted by federal statute;
Be it further resolved: That
Monitoring and reporting be developed for such projects and services to assure
effectiveness and transparency;
Be it further resolved that
sufficient funding be provided to assure the realization of the decarceration
as defined in this bill.
Very nice. Because I have such strong feelings about the setup of children for future incarceration by the failure of schools and dearth of opportunities for healthy recreation I'd like the "100% of savings" part to mention that stuff. But basically a sound proposal for legislation.
ReplyDeleteThis is great. This is exactly what we need right here. What a way to put something together that goes completely against the Prison system and it all happens to be facts. Well put together.
ReplyDelete