The
circumstances surrounding the shootings of two police officers in Brooklyn on
December 20, 2014 are disturbing for a number of reasons. Because mainstream news
outlets had full articles with the biography of the shooter shortly after the
incident, alternative media specialists who cover the news from the perspective
of grassroots movements are asking questions. They wonder whether there was
foul play and whether this incident represents a conscious attempt on the part
of the state to de-legitimize and repress the largest and broadest movement
against police violence in U.S. history.
If
the shooter, Ismaaiyl Brinsley, was acting on his own and was mentally ill, his
actions reflect the violence of a society that has been locked into war for
decades, that remains the only industrialized nation that executes its
citizens, and that regularly deploys military search-and-destroy, swat missions
against its population.
The
young man’s violence is also a reflection of the despair of a people living in
a system that won't deliver justice. Over the last number of years, we have
been flooded with thousands of videos of police homicides and violence, which
would not have been revealed were it not for social media. The tragic Eric Gardner video, in which his
killer is clearly depicted abusing authority and deploying homicidal force, is
not an aberration. Videos like these have been circulating for years among
people who are regularly dehumanized and killed by the police. They shock the
conscience. The absence of justice in the face of the growing barbarity of the
state, and its police, has led hundreds of thousands of people into the
streets. A minuscule percentage of these people who are unstable are bound to
play out the insanity of a crazy-making system through there actions. We live
in a system that pretends to be just and democratic, but refuses to respond to
the basic tenets of humanity and the calls for justice of multitudes of people.
The
police are already using the killings of these cops as an opportunity to
declare war against the black community and to criminalize the growing movement
against police violence. And the Mayor of New York has explicitly called upon
the citizens of New York to side with the police by asking everyone to report
anything they hear against this racist institution. Meanwhile, the New York
police are painting themselves as victims, when in fact incidents like those
that took place today are extremely rare. In fact, despite police claims of
fear for their lives to justify excessive force and the pummeling of detainees
with dozens of bullets, the most common cause of police death in the line of duty is an
accident!
According
to the FBI, killings of police officers went down by almost half between 2012 and 2013 and
are at a 50-year low. Assaults against police officers are also at an all-time
low. In contrast, over the last three years the homicidal behavior of the
police against civilians has reached a
two-decade high. A recent study reports that police kill a black person every 28 hours. And since September 11, 2001 police officers have killed about five
thousand US civilians. That's a larger figure than the number of soldiers
killed in Iraq. During this period, police have also been armed militarily in a
civilian environment, and their tactics reflect a war-like mentality.
The
unrelenting violence of the police against civilians in the US has reached the
level of an international human rights crisis. And the long history of police
violence against the black community in the US has reached genocidal
proportions. So when officers and politicians begin using scare tactics to
disarm the militancy of a growing movement, we have to remember that this
tactic is one that they’ve rehearsed throughout US history to subdue people’s
struggles.
If
Brinsley was not acting on his own, however, a brief reminder of history is in
order. According to its own Sixties memos, the objective of the FBI's Counter
Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) was to undermine the popular activist groups
of the period, by any means necessary, and to prevent its leaders from
"gaining respectability by discrediting them.” That is all to say
that the possibility that the Brooklyn officer killings might involve foul play
cannot be easily dismissed as crazy, black-nationalist paranoia. It is possible that a black young man was
put up to this by Cointelpro-type forces.
Today
there are examples, unexplored by the mainstream media, of police throwing fire grenades into parked cars and
burning buildings in Ferguson on the night that the grand jury refused to indict Darren
Wilson for the murder of Mike Brown. Undercover officers have also thrown rocks and behaved like agent
provocateurs
at black-lives-matter demonstrations; and when the cops were discovered by
protestors they unleashed their guns against demonstrators, as in the example of
Oakland, CA. Moreover, the last 10 years have been littered with examples of
government entrapment of mentally deranged individuals in the so-called war on
terror.
If
the police shooting in Brooklyn is an example of an undercover campaign by the
US government to destroy the growing movements against police violence, the
notion that the state would sacrifice its foot soldiers is horrific, but not
unusual.
We
have to keep in mind that our campaign is just and moral. Our task is to
continue to educate the general public.
In
the words of Assata Shakur: "It is our duty to fight for our freedom.
It is our duty to win. We must love each other and support each other. We have
nothing to lose but our chains."
Johanna Fernรกndez is assistant professor of history at Baruch College of the City University of New York and a former Fulbright Scholar. She is author of the forthcoming books, When the World Was Their Stage: A History of the Young Lords Party, 1968-1974 & Writing on the Wall, Selected Prison Writings of Mumia Abu Jamal. She is the writer and producer of the feature length film, Justice on Trial: The Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal and part of the Campaign to Bring Mumia Home.
No comments:
Post a Comment